Hoaxes: When Social Media Gets It Wrong
Jan

There are times when social media gets it right. From serious news like the earthquakes in Haiti (a story which Twitter broke) to the more fun viral ideas that help spread, say, cancer awareness by updating Facebook statuses with bra colors, one thing’s for certain in social media: if its hot, it spreads like wild fire.
But then there’s the flip side: when (seemingly hot) news spreads without verification.
Two cases in point:
Hoax 1:Facebook To Start Charging Users From July 2010
While glancing at your Facebook feed, did you discover a few friends joining groups that protest these “monthly charges”? I did, here’s a screenshot.
I found two groups (I’m guessing there are many) that seem to have gained a significant following: 300,000 Members Needed To Stop Facebook From Charging £/$14.99 a month has close to 900,000 members and No, I Will Not Pay£3.99 a Month To Use Facebook From July 9th 2010! has 457, 345 members. When I poked around, I couldn’t find any substantial meat to support this allegation. What I did find were veterans like Nick O’Neill claiming on the unofficial Facebook blog again and again that the rumours were baseless. I also found a post in the Telegraph wherein a spokesperson for the company has said:
We have no plans to charge users for Facebook’s basic services. Facebook is a free service for its 350 million users
I’m also left wondering why Facebook has not addressed this on their official blog. Its also an alarming indicator of how gullible consumers of social media can be.
Hoax 2: Twitter Trending Topic: RIP Johnny Depp
Did you know that Johnny Depp died in a car accident yesterday? Well on Twitter he did. Last night, a hoax began doing the rounds on the Internet, wherein a cleverly crafted fake CNN page announced the unfortunate news. Pretty soon the news spread to Twitter and RIP Johnny Depp became a trending topic.
In a little while though it became clear that the news was a hoax and that the sexiest man alive is indeed, alive and well. I looked up CNN to see if they there were any clarifications offered about the hoax. Nope.
Ok so we get it, rumours spread. Before the Internet existed, they would fly around from cafe to home to community center. Now they spread a million times faster unbridled by location or source. What can brands learn from such fiascoes? Should they be more pro-active and take more control of these conversations? Should Facebook/CNN have officially announced these rumours to be untrue? I would think so. Sure, things get out of hand, but its never too late to jump into the conversation and be the reliable, one-stop source of all information regarding an alleged rumour.
What would you do? I’m all ears…
Image courtesy: .S U B. Flickr
